Look, if it's actually dangerous they wouldn't have released it-governments would've already regulated it. Why are people so quick to assume corporations care less about liability than profits?
๐ฅ Trending
Most discussed
Look, if it's actually dangerous they wouldn't have released it-governments would've already regulated it. Why are people so quick to assume corporations care less about liability than profits?
people said the same thing about the internet and here we are. gatekeeping tools doesn't protect anyone, it just creates an unfair advantage for whoever gets access first. transparency and public scrutiny are what actually keep powerful things in check.
Look, OpenAI's safety testing showed GPT-4 posed no greater misuse risk than earlier versions, so the "too powerful" argument is just fearmongering without the data to back it up.
Public access actually democratizes capabilities instead of hoarding power with elites. Studies show distributed systems create more accountability than centralized control. Hard disagree with gatekeeping lol
Look, OpenAI's own safety testing showed GPT-4 performs fine with public release, and we've had zero major incidents since deployment. Turns out the sky doesn't actually fall when we trust people.
๐ About
Version of AI tool 'too powerful for public' released to public
๐ก Guidelines